Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ndmmz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-02T16:20:08.867Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Devaleraea, A New Genus of the Palmariaceae (Rhodophyta) in the North Atlantic and North Pacific

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

Michael D. Guiry
Michael D. Guiry
Affiliation:
Department of Botany, University College, Galway, Ireland
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

INTRODUCTION

The family Palmariaceae Guiry (Palmariales: Rhodophyta) at present includes the genera Palmaria Stackhouse (the holotype genus: see Guiry, 1974, p. 523), Halosacdon Kiitzing, Leptosarca A. & E. S. Gepp and Neohalosacdocolax I. K. Lee & Kurogi. Halosacdon and Leptosarca were included in the original description of the family (Guiry, 1974) and Neohalosacdocolax was recently described by Lee & Kurogi (1978) for a small parasite on Halosacdon minjaii I. K. Lee from the Aleutian Islands. The structure and reproduction of Neohalosacdocolax make it quite clear that its affinities lie with the Palmariaceae (Lee & Kurogi, 1978). The Palmariaceae of the island of Hokkaido (northern Japan) have been the subject of a recent study (Lee, 1978) and the details of structure and reproduction given for the northwestern Pacific species of Palmaria and Halosacdon confirm that the unusual structure and mode of reproduction described by Guiry (1974, 1975, 1978) for Atlantic and northeastern Pacific representatives of these genera are also found in the northwestern Pacific representatives (see also Lee, 1977a).

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 62 , Issue 1 , February 1982 , pp. 1 - 13
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agardh, J. G., 1852. Species Genera el Ordines Algarum, seu Descriptiones Succinctae Specierwn, Generun et Ordinun, quibus Algarun Regnum Constituitur. Vol. 2, no. 2 Species Genera et Ordines Floridearum… 352–720 pp. Lund: C. W. K. Gleerup.Google Scholar
Agardh, J. G., 1876. Species Genera et Ordines Algarum.…Vol. 3, no. 1. Epicrisis Systematis Floridearum. vii, 724 pp. Leipzig: T. O. Weigel.Google Scholar
Barton, E. S., 1893. A provisional list of the marine algae of the Cape of Good Hope. Journal of Botany, British and Foreign, 31, 53–56, 81–84, 110–114, 138–144, 171–177, 202–210.Google Scholar
Bonneau, E. R., 1977. Polymorphic behaviour of Ulva lactuca (Chlorophyta) in axenic culture. I. Occurrence of Enteromorpha-hkc plants in haploid clones. Journal of Phycology, 13, 133–140.Google Scholar
Chapman, V. J. & Dromgoole, F. I., 1970. Issue 2: Florideophycidae: Rhodymeniales. In The Marine Algae of New Zealand. III. Rhodophyceae (ed. Chapman, V. J.), pp. 115–154. Berlin: Verlag von J. Cramer.Google Scholar
Feldmann, G. & Bodard, M., 1965. Une nouvelle espéce de Botryocladia des côtes du Sénégal. Bulletin de l'lnstitut océanographique, 65, (1342), 14 pp.Google Scholar
FØyn, B., 1959. Geschlechtskontrollierte Vererbung bei der marinen Griinalge Ulva mutabilis. Archiv für Protistenkunde, 104, 236–253.Google Scholar
FØyn, B., 1960. Sex-linked inheritance in Ulva. Biological Bulletin. Marine Biological Laboratory, Woods Hole, Mass., 118, 407–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
FØyn, B., 1961. Globose, a recessive mutant in Ulva mutabilis. Botanica marina, 3, 60–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
FØyn, B., 1962. Two linked autosomal genes in Ulva mutabilis. Botanica marina, 4, 156–162.Google Scholar
Gayral, P., 1959. Premierès observations et reflexions sur des Ulvacées en culture. Botaniste, 43, 85–100.Google Scholar
Gmelin, S. G., 1768. Historia Fucorum. vi, 239 pp. St Petersburg: Academia Scientarum.Google Scholar
Guiry, M. D., 1974. A preliminary consideration of the taxonomic position of Palmaria palmata (Linnaeus) Stackhouse =Rhodymenia palmata (Linnaeus) Greville. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 54, 509–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guiry, M. D., 1975. An assessment of Palmaria palmata forma mollis (S. et G.) comb.nov. (=Rhodymenia palmata forma mollis S. et G.) in the eastern North Pacific. Syesis, 8, 245–261.Google Scholar
Guiry, M. D., 1978. The importance of sporangia in the classification of the Florideophyceae. In Modern Approaches to the Taxonomy of Red and Breton Algae (ed. Irvine, D. E. G. and Price, J. H.), pp. 111–144. Academic Press.Google Scholar
Kützing, F. T., 1843. Phycologia Generalis oder Anatomie, Physiologie und Systemkunde der Tar.ge. xxxii, 458 pp. Leipzig: F. A. Brockhaus.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kylin, H., 1956. Die Gattungen der Rhodophyceen. xv, 673 pp. Lund: C. W. K. Gleerup.Google Scholar
Lee, I. K., 1969. On the male organs of Rhodymeniales. Korean Journal of Botany, 12, 143–150.Google Scholar
Lee, I. K., 1977 a. Halosaccion minjaii spec.nov. (Rhodophyta, Rhodymeniales) from the Aleutian Islands. Phycologia, 16, 245–252.Google Scholar
Lee, I. K., 1977 b. On the nature of Halosaccion glandiforme (Gmelin) Ruprecht occurring along the Pacific coast of northern America. Journal of Phycology, 13 (supplement), 39. [Abstract no. 221.]Google Scholar
Lee, I. K., 1978. Studies on Rhodymeniales from Hokkaido. Journal of the Faculty of Science, Hokkaido University (Botany), 11, 1–194.Google Scholar
Lee, I. K. & Kurogi, M., 1978. Neohalosacciocolax aleutica gen. et sp.nov. (Rhodophyta), parasitic on Halosaccion minjaii I. K. Lee from the north Pacific. British Phycological Journal, 13, 131–139.Google Scholar
Lee, I. K., Makiexko, V. F. & Kurogi, M., 1979. On the structure and reproductive organs of Halosaccion glandiforme (Gmelin) Ruprecht, Rhodophyta. Japanese Journal of Phycology (Sórui), 27, 25–30.Google Scholar
Lepechin, I., 1775. Quatuor fucorum species descriptae. Novi Commentarii Academiae Scientarum Imperialis Petropolitanae, 19, 476–481.Google Scholar
Linnaeus, C., 1767. Systema Naturae per Regna Tria Naturae, Secundwn Classes, Ordines, Genera, Species, cum Characteribus & Differentiis, vol. 2, 12th ed. Stockholm: Laurentii Salvii.Google Scholar
Meer, J. P. Van Der & Chen, L. C.-M., 1979. Evidence for sexual reproduction in the red algae Palmaria palmata and Halosaccion ramentaceum. Canadian Journal of Botany, 57: 2452–2459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meer, J. P. Van Der & Todd, E. R., 1980. The life history of Palmaria palmata in culture. A new type for the Rhodophyta. Canadian Journal of Botany, 58, 1250–1256.Google Scholar
Oeder, G. C., 1767. Icones Plantarum Sponte Nascentium in Regnis Daniae et Norvegiae, in Ducatibus Slesvici et Holsatiae, et in Comitatibus Oldenburgi et Delnenhorstiae… Florae Danicae Inscriptum, fasc. 6, 10 pp. pls. CCCI-CCCLX. Copenhagen: Nicolai Mölleri.Google Scholar
Papenfuss, G. F., 1943. Notes on South African marine algae: II. Journal of South African Botany, 9, 79–92.Google Scholar
Papenfuss, G. F., 1976. Landmarks in Pacific North American phycology. In Marine Algae of California (ed. Abbott, I. A. and Hollenberg, G. J.), pp. 21–46. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Postels, A. & Ruprecht, F., 1840. Illustrationes Algarum in Itinere circa Orbem…Exsecuto in Ocemo Pacifico Imprimis Septrionali ad Littora Rossica Asiatico-Americana Collectarum. iv, 22 pp. Leningrad: Eduardi Pratz.Google Scholar
Ruprecht, F. J., 1850. Algae ochotenses. 243 pp. [preprint of] Tange des Ochotskischen Mccres. In Reise in den aüssersten Norden und Osten Sibiriens Während der Jahre 1843 und 1844. Vol. 2, no. 2. Botanik (ed. Von Middendorff, A. T.), pp. 191–435. St Petersburg. [Latter was published 1851.]Google Scholar
Schmitz, F., 1889. Systematische Übersicht der bisher bekannten Gattungen der Florideen. Flora, oder allgemeine botanische Zeitung, 72, 435–456.Google Scholar
Setchell, W. A. & Gardner, N. L., 1903. Algae of northwestern America. University of California Publications in Botany, 1, 165–418.Google Scholar
Stafleu, F., 1967. Taxonomic Literature: A Selective Guide to Botanical Publications with Dates, Commentaries and Types, xx, 556 pp. Utrecht: International Bureau for Plant Taxonomy and Nomenclature.Google Scholar
Stafleu, F. A.et al., 1978. International Code of Botanical Nomenclature… Regnum Vegetable, vol. 97. 457 pp. Utrecht: Bohn, Scheltma & Holkema.Google Scholar
Toni, G. B. De, 1900. Sylloge Algarum omnium hucusque Cognitarum. Vol. 4, no. 2. Sylloge Floridearum.….387–776 pp. Padova.Google Scholar
Turner, D., 1819. Fuci sive Plantarum Fucorum Generi a Botanicis Ascriptarum Icones Descriptiones et Historia. Fuci; or, colored Figures and Descriptions of the Plants Referred by Botanists to the Genus Fucus, vol. 4, 153, 7 pp. London: J. & A. Arch.Google Scholar
Yendo, K., 1909. Notes on algae new to Japan. Botanical Magazine, Tokyo, 23, 117–133.Google Scholar
Zinova, A. D., 1953. De alga Rhodophytica nova e genere Halosaccion. Notulae systematicae ex Instituto cryptogamico Horti botanici petropolitani, 9, 93–95. [In Russian.]Google Scholar