Good for her doesn't look like her though. Can't wait to punch cohh's in game model. I won't be playing the game but I will grab my wife's controller when she reaches him.
I mean even then, it doesn't even need to be "dealt with".
She's a person who likes video games and has centered her livelihood around them and is getting small role in a video game she's extremely excited about. There's nothing to hate here, there's nothing to be concerned about. It's a nice little story and that's it.
It's just another reminder that despite the overall progressive slant of this forum, it's still full of obnoxious gatekeeping nerds.
Hasn't even been two pages since someone suggested that by because reasons and that she stole the opportunity from a professional. You know...even though she's done voice work in multiple games before.Maybe I missed it, but, is anyone saying she should never act in games or post videos on YouTube?
Why is it there there were no requests for proper disclosure,How is asking for proper disclosure translated to gatekeeping?
Maybe I missed it, but, is anyone saying she should never act in games or post videos on YouTube? How is asking for proper disclosure translated to gatekeeping?
The gatekeeping aspect is the fact that once again a thread about an attractive women doing something game related gets a shit ton more attention form naysayers than when a guy does it.How is asking for proper disclosure translated to gatekeeping?
Only speaking for myself but my problem is not at all with her, I understand why she accepted this role and why she and her fans are excited for it.I mean even then, it doesn't even need to be "dealt with".
She's a person who likes video games and has centered her livelihood around them and is getting small role in a video game she's extremely excited about. There's nothing to hate here, there's nothing to be concerned about. It's a nice little story and that's it.
It's just another reminder that despite the overall progressive slant of this forum, it's still full of obnoxious gatekeeping nerds.
It happened with Geoff too, and he's close friends with Kojima it seems.Why can't we just say congrats to her and move on like normal damn people?
I won't try to convince you to buy the game because I'm on the fence about it myself, but as far as Alanah goes, she is an actress as well. She was on a TV series and worked on Gears 5 and Afterparty as voice actress before Cyberpunk. It's not like this is a one-off promotion.Only speaking for myself but my problem is not at all with her, I understand why she accepted this role and why she and her fans are excited for it.
My problem is only with the developer because I wasunder the impression that this would be a game that would be taking things more seriously from an artistic point of view. And of course not everyone needs to agree on this but to me having gamer youtubers in your game quite simply cheapens the experience and makes it less transcendental. Not every game needs to be artsy or serious or whatever, I just thought this was young to be one of them.
Now, because of this and a lot of the GTA kind of vibes I get from the latest trailers I'm pretty convinced this game is just something very different than what I was expecting. It just tries to be another mainstream blockbuster AAA game that aims to be liked by the greatest amounts of people at all costs. Makes total sense from a business pov but from an artistic one it just seems like a missed opportunity.
Haven't played RDR2 but from what I know about that game, Rockstar really took a lot of risks and made things in certain ways because the artistic vision took them there, even though it was probably not the best idea marketing wise. I was hoping for something along those lines.
You probably shouldn't have expected that from CDPR though. I still remember everytime a repeated npc line briefly took me out of the game in Witcher 3 because it was a reference to some movie or pop song.Only speaking for myself but my problem is not at all with her, I understand why she accepted this role and why she and her fans are excited for it.
My problem is only with the developer because I wasunder the impression that this would be a game that would be taking things more seriously from an artistic point of view. And of course not everyone needs to agree on this but to me having gamer youtubers in your game quite simply cheapens the experience and makes it less transcendental. Not every game needs to be artsy or serious or whatever, I just thought this was young to be one of them.
Now, because of this and a lot of the GTA kind of vibes I get from the latest trailers I'm pretty convinced this game is just something very different than what I was expecting. It just tries to be another mainstream blockbuster AAA game that aims to be liked by the greatest amounts of people at all costs. Makes total sense from a business pov but from an artistic one it just seems like a missed opportunity.
Haven't played RDR2 but from what I know about that game, Rockstar really took a lot of risks and made things in certain ways because the artistic vision took them there, even though it was probably not the best idea marketing wise. I was hoping for something along those lines.
Who was the first "influencer" to be added into a video game?
Wasn't Matt Casamassina in Perfect Dark?
Depends quite what you count, but there's a decent argument for Violet Berlin in Micro Machines 2:
This should be the case.Why are you taking critique from streamers and influencers seriously?
I feel like a lot of folks here cannot distinguish good critique from bad, so they just hate the idea of any face in any media being in any media. Like, yeah, she is in the game and so will others. That alone should make you rethink how you think of their commentary. It isn't a tricky minefield at all.
This should be threadmarked lol
Because yeah. I'm really glad she said that, because she has really been pushing the game this year. And now it makes sense why.
This should be threadmarked lol
Because yeah. I'm really glad she said that, because she has really been pushing the game this year. And now it makes sense why.
"Proper" is subjective and varies from person to person.
What is the end goal of the disclosure? What level of disclosure is good enough?
She already stated that she's not reviewing the game and that she is biased to like it, and advises viewers to take her opinion on it with a grain of salt. She says it every time she talks about the game.
Are there people in this thread concerned about her lack of disclosure up to this point? What grand deception occurred before she revealed she plays an NPC that is so off putting? Did you preorder the game because of one of her streams and now everything about CyberPunk 2077 has changed in your mind because she's in it?
Just trying to get at the root of people's concerns here.
Guess i'm not sure how that works. If she's paid for her VA work, does she need to put #Ad because she doesn't necessarily benefit from a sale, she benefitted from the role generally. Like most VAs don't say ad when they say they're excited to see their tv show. I think what she's done so far is fine, but she's definitely an influencer, no matter what she says.Ok it is a good step that she said she is not reviewing the game but she is pushing that game like nothing else. She should clarify if CDPR are paying her to promote the game as well, that's why it is weird.
This should be threadmarked lol
Because yeah. I'm really glad she said that, because she has really been pushing the game this year. And now it makes sense why.
or maybe she's been pushing it because she's very happy about what they've shown so far and she wants to talk about it a bunch?
Why can't we just say congrats to her and move on like normal damn people?
Stop talking about Lawnmower Man!
or maybe she's been pushing it because she's very happy about what they've shown so far and she wants to talk about it a bunch?
Why would a gaming streamer want to post videos about one of the biggest game releases of the year?
Makes no sense...
I dont know what you guys are smoking, but it looks exactly like her.
If I didnt know she was in the game, and found that NPC, I would say "hey, that looks like Alanah Pearce".
Why can't we just say congrats to her and move on like normal damn people?
^^Why can't we just say congrats to her and move on like normal damn people?
Era has a strange fascination with not wanting somewhat internet famous people cameoing in their form of entertainment.Why can't we just say congrats to her and move on like normal damn people?
Haven't played RDR2 but from what I know about that game, Rockstar really took a lot of risks and made things in certain ways because the artistic vision took them there, even though it was probably not the best idea marketing wise. I was hoping for something along those lines.
Ok it is a good step that she said she is not reviewing the game but she is pushing that game like nothing else. She should clarify if CDPR are paying her to promote the game as well, that's why it is weird.
Yea she's an influencer, but she's been pretty open about everything concerning the game. I think that's all fine. A reviewer being swayed is a totally different story (and Alannah doesn't do reviews). I think an influencer who loves the game quite a bit being put in the game seems perfectly fine to me.Alannah seems nice but I don't like it when the media (critics, influencers etc) are used in game (like when Keighley was in Death Stranding). Separation of church and state ya know.
Why would someone who's legitimately trying to get into the gaming industry via voice acting cheapen the experience because she lent her voice and likeness in a game that will likely lead to her being able to lend her voice and likeness to more games? Because she started off as a writer and host for gaming news on a gaming site?Only speaking for myself but my problem is not at all with her, I understand why she accepted this role and why she and her fans are excited for it.
My problem is only with the developer because I wasunder the impression that this would be a game that would be taking things more seriously from an artistic point of view. And of course not everyone needs to agree on this but to me having gamer youtubers in your game quite simply cheapens the experience and makes it less transcendental. Not every game needs to be artsy or serious or whatever, I just thought this was young to be one of them.
Now, because of this and a lot of the GTA kind of vibes I get from the latest trailers I'm pretty convinced this game is just something very different than what I was expecting. It just tries to be another mainstream blockbuster AAA game that aims to be liked by the greatest amounts of people at all costs. Makes total sense from a business pov but from an artistic one it just seems like a missed opportunity.
Haven't played RDR2 but from what I know about that game, Rockstar really took a lot of risks and made things in certain ways because the artistic vision took them there, even though it was probably not the best idea marketing wise. I was hoping for something along those lines.